OPEN SOURCE BY TASK

Open source AI visibility trackers

A self-hosted AI visibility tracker can give you data control, but it still needs reliable collection and maintenance.

open source

Elmo

A self-hosted monitoring platform for tracking brand visibility across AI search experiences.

Best for
Teams that can run a Docker Compose stack.
Software cost
Free open-source software
Runtime / provider cost
Hosting and any connected provider costs.
Setup effort
High
Maintenance effort
Medium
Skill level
Advanced
License
MIT
Status
Verified
Data location
Your self-hosted deployment.
Limitation
Requires self-hosting and operating the connected services.
Last checked
2026-07-23

Last checked: 2026-07-23.

Repository

open source

OneGlanse

A self-hosted product interface for collecting and reviewing AI search visibility checks.

Best for
Users willing to operate browser-based collection.
Software cost
Free open-source software
Runtime / provider cost
Hosting and any model or browser-service costs.
Setup effort
High
Maintenance effort
High
Skill level
Advanced
License
MIT
Status
Verified
Data location
Your self-hosted deployment.
Limitation
Browser authentication and automation require ongoing maintenance.
Last checked
2026-07-23

Last checked: 2026-07-23.

Repository

open source

GEO/AEO Tracker

A feature-rich self-hosted tracker for visibility and citations across answer engines.

Best for
Technical users who accept external-service operating costs.
Software cost
Free open-source software
Runtime / provider cost
Bright Data and model-provider costs.
Setup effort
High
Maintenance effort
Medium
Skill level
Advanced
License
MIT
Status
Verified
Data location
Your self-hosted deployment and connected providers.
Limitation
Requires paid Bright Data and model-provider accounts for full operation.
Last checked
2026-07-23

Last checked: 2026-07-23.

Repository

Before deploying: review the repository, license, provider dependencies, secrets handling, and the practical cost of operating the stack.

Open source AI visibility trackers should be compared by deployment burden, provider costs, and operating limits.